>Minnesota Ballot Recount: How hard is determining voter intent?

>

I enjoyed taking a look at these challenged ballots from the Senate race in Minnesota.  For some of these, it’s really hard to try to figure out what the voter wanted.  Especially the voter who bubbled in next to Al Franken, sort of crossed the bubble out and then wrote “Lizard People” in the write-in block just like he had for some other ballot contests.  Other challenges are just asncomical, where a voter bubbled in next to both Al Franken and Norm Coleman, then drew a single line through Al Franken’s name.  This one’s a simple vote for Coleman, right?  Franken’s team challenged the ballot, stating that the voter intended to underline Franken’s name (the line goes through the center of “AL FRA”, then slopes down underneath “NKEN”).

Bubble in next to the name.  If you can’t do that, make it really, really clear what you meant.

Here’s a slideshow of the challenged ballots, but it’s more fun to vote on how you’d rule if you were an elections judge.

Source: Minnesota Public Radio, hat tip to electoral-vote.com

Advertisements

About perkinsms

I'm an engineer and father interested in transit, parking and economics.
This entry was posted in elections, government, politics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to >Minnesota Ballot Recount: How hard is determining voter intent?

  1. Tom A. says:

    >I had a blast voting on those, and I nearly always agreed with the masses.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s